<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State&#8217;s Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzolich.com/home/2005/states-rights/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzolich.com/home/2005/states-rights</link>
	<description>One Corner in the Ether</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzolich.com/home/2005/states-rights#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzolich.com/2005/states-rights/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>So does this mean that the apocalyptic battle between the US and canada- as foretold in the south park movie- has been moved up? 
PS Props on the new preview function</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this mean that the apocalyptic battle between the US and canada- as foretold in the south park movie- has been moved up?<br />
PS Props on the new preview function</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAFW</title>
		<link>http://www.buzolich.com/home/2005/states-rights#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>SAFW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzolich.com/2005/states-rights/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Fortunately, that while the decision allows federal prosecution of marijuana offenses, the specific language of the decision allows for the argument of medical necessity to be used as a defense in criminal proceedings. It will be interesting to see how the first few test cases turn out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately, that while the decision allows federal prosecution of marijuana offenses, the specific language of the decision allows for the argument of medical necessity to be used as a defense in criminal proceedings. It will be interesting to see how the first few test cases turn out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzolich</title>
		<link>http://www.buzolich.com/home/2005/states-rights#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>buzolich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzolich.com/2005/states-rights/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>At no point in my rambling, incoherant diatribe did I pretend to  use proper grammar.  Ass.

Perhaps you'd care to sign up for the job?  The pay sucks but the benefits are...actually none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At no point in my rambling, incoherant diatribe did I pretend to  use proper grammar.  Ass.</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;d care to sign up for the job?  The pay sucks but the benefits are&#8230;actually none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzolich.com/home/2005/states-rights#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzolich.com/2005/states-rights/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Can I get some proofreading here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get some proofreading here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
